Whirr – “Around”

(Photo Credit: Brooklyn Vegan)

Grade: B-

Whirr’s new album is only four tracks long, and falls awkwardly in between an EP and an LP. At 28 minutes or so, it’s roughly the length of some punk albums, but shorter than many of their other albums. This is, unintentionally, symbolic of the album’s awkward placement in between genres, blurring together metal, noise rock and shoegaze into that pumps up the volume but often hangs around longer than it needs to.

The four tracks on “Around” range from 5:53 to 8:47, much longer than the average songs on Whirr’s previous albums. The band is trying out more of a shoegaze sound, possibly inspired by the crazy work being done by crossover geniuses Deafheaven. Shoegaze is an incredibly tough genre of music to pull off, because it requires patience on both the band and the listener. A band has to maintain a sound, even a note, for a long time at maximum volume, without it becoming monotonous. There’s a reason there aren’t many famous shoegaze acts. Whirr don’t exactly pull it off. The songs stretch on too long, ideas too thought-up. The volume is there, and the gloomy, bleak guitars from their previous albums support the ideas. But there isn’t quite enough to keep in interesting.

The third track, “Keep,” is the album’s best, because of a volume change roughly 3:30 into the song. A subdued and constant sound is suddenly dropped out, and guitars kick back in much louder than before. It is this long, drawn out sound with the occasional hiccups that makes acts like Deafheaven and Godspeed You! Black Emperor the inspirational acts they are. The song transitions into the title track, in one long song that would’ve been too daunting and too long to release as one actual track. “Around,” just like the first two tracks, overstays it’s volume, staying quieter for its seven minutes.

I have to commend the band for attempting to blend genres like this. They do a pretty decent job, considering all of the conflicting elements. The songs just stick around too long. The volume, the guitars and the ideas are all there and great, but there’s actually just a little too much of it. If Whirr were to keep exploring this idea, though, I’d keep listening.

-If you like this try: Deafheaven’s “Sunbather.” I’ve already linked to my review a few times before.

-By Andrew McNally

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Whirr – “Around”

  1. This album is not a crossover record and definitely not metal or noise rock. Its nothing like godspeed or deafheaven. You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about, it’s a shoegaze record and if you think this is drawn out you’re an idiot. Don’t review records if you aren’t familiar with what records influenced the ones you’re criticizing.

    • After some consideration I’d definitely agree that it isn’t metal, I use based genres to try to describe lesser known bands, but metal is too far away from this album. I have taken it out of the metal tag.
      The only time I used the word crossover in my review is to describe Deafheaven, I wouldn’t call “Around” a crossover record either, but I stand by calling it a blending of shoegaze and noise rock influences. Not actual noise rock, no, but there’s more of an influence here than most other shoegaze bands. And this is where I draw up the comparison to Deafheaven – the similarities are more thematic than aural. I’ve used Deafheaven as a jumping off point for a lot of my reviews, because of the seamless genre contortions they perform (and because it is an album I know very well, thanks).
      I do think the ideas on this record are drawn-out, because that’s what shoegaze is at a fundamental level. It’s a basic, usually loud premise stretched out to incredible lengths. And I don’t mean this as a criticism at all, I’m a fan. But that’s what the album is. The songs are not nearly as drawn-out as other shoegaze acts, sure, but I felt that three of the four tracks outstayed their welcome just a bit.
      I’m sorry you’re displeased with my post, our interpretations of the album are obviously different and it is ultimately a subjective matter. I’ll be honest, I’m not as familiar with Whirr as other bands I’ve reviewed. But I enjoyed the album and I go out of my way to promote lesser-known groups. I accept and weigh all criticisms on my reviews. At least we can both agree that “Around” is, at least, a good record.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s